
All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; and Third, it is accepted as self-evident. These words of wisdom were penned long ago by nineteenth century philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, but could equally be applied to the innovations of the IT industry today and specifically to open source software (OSS).
Just fifteen years ago we saw the dawn of open source as a radical approach to software licensing. Rapacious proprietary licensing had left companies reeling as maintenance contracts were cranked up and CIOs were put to the rack by vendors with no feasible means of escape. But still, the industry ridiculed and misunderstood the power and potential of the open source concept. I recall clearly the cartoon that positioned open source as the free toy in the box of software breakfast cereal.
As adoption grew, so we saw the era of opposition. I would never say that it was violent – the likes of Microsoft and Oracle are gentle men and women after all – but it was tough, sustained and determined opposition to undermine the applicability of open source to all but the most fringe environments.
Today, we have seen in the past few months a major change in Governmental attitude both in Europe and the US. The UK Government’s IT procurement policy, announced in February, mandated that when there were no significant cost differences then “open source will be selected on the basis of its additional inherent flexibility”.
At a European level there has long been strong support for open source through the Enterprise Interoperability Forum, but in 2008 European anti-trust commissioner Neelie Kroes went further and stated “I know a smart business decision when I see one – choosing open standards is a very smart business decision indeed. No citizen or company should be forced or encouraged to choose a closed technology over an open one.”
Finally, the US has made its colours clear. In a policy statement on the use of open source software by the Department of Defence, the acting CIO stated his belief in the advantages of OSS, while also acknowledging the past problems where adoption has been “hampered by misconceptions and misunderstandings of laws, policies and regulations”. Most important was his statement of intent to “increase the benefits of OSS to the DoD”.
My belief is that in Open Source we have now reached Schopenhauer’s third stage; where the benefits of the adoption of open source are now accepted as self-evident. It’s taken us a while to get here, but it’s good to arrive.
Sally


